Sow Behavior Expression: Adoptions Effect

Author(s): Arroyo Paula, Corva Santiago, Ferrari Ricardo, A. G. Antonini

Crossed adoptions based on female potential are recommended in commercial production. This are made in the first 24 hours postpartum because it is at this moment that the imprinting occurs, it is the process by which certain stimuli are associated to produce different behaviors. In order to decrease or eliminate the recognition of the strange piglet, prior to introducing it into the new litter, different strategies are carried out. Early experiences may have long-term effects on future behavior. These experiences are influenced by mother-litter interaction. The aim of this work was to determine the possible association between adoptions and sows behavioral modifications. Females that donated piglets spent more time “walking” than those who did not donate piglets (p<0.05). And there is a possible relation between farrowing and the condition of being raised by an adoptive mother (p<0.05).

Sow Behavior, Nursing, Swine Production, Adoptions

1. Altmann J. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behavior 1974; vol 49, parts 3-4, pp 227-267
2. Algers B. Nursing in pigs: communicating needs and distributing resources. J Anim Sci. 1993;71(10):2826–31.
3. Champagne FA. Maternal imprints and the origins of variation. HormBehav [Internet]. 2011;60(1):4–11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.02.016
4. Champagne FA. Epigenetic mechanisms and the transgenerational effects of maternal care. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2008;29(3):386–97.
5. Chidgey KL, Morel PCH, Stafford KJ, Barugh IW. The performance and behaviour of gilts and their piglets is influenced by whether they were born and reared in farrowing crates or farrowing pens. LivestSci. 2016;193(December 2015):51–7.
6. Dohoo, I. R., Martin, W., &Stryhn, H. Veterinary epidemiologic research (No. V413 DOHv). Charlottetown, Canada: AVC Incorporated.(2003).
7. Francis D. Nongenomic Transmission Across Generations of Maternal Behavior and Stress Responses in the Rat. Science (80- ) [Internet]. 1999;286(5442):1155–8. Available from: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.286.5442.1155
8. García-Munguía CA, Ruíz-Flores A, López-Ordaz R, García-Munguía AM, Ibarra-Juárez LA. Comportamiento productivo y reproductivo al parto y al destete en cerdas de siete líneas genéticas. RevMex Ciencias Pecu. 2014;5(2):201–11.
9. Hellbrugger B. Genetic aspect of piglet losses and the maternal behaviour of sows. Dr Thesis [Internet]. 2007; Available from: http://www.tierzucht.unikiel.de/dissertationen/diss_hellbruegge.pdf
10. Hernández A. Conducta de la cerda doméstica y su camada behavior of domesticsow and herlitter. Abanico Vet [Internet]. 2014;4(1):51–60. Available from: http://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/abanico/av-2014/av141f.pdf
11. Jensen, P. Comportamiento del cerdo. Etología de los animales domésticos. Zaragoza, España. Jensen (Editor), Editorial Acribia,2004. pp. 168-84.
12. Lahitte HB, Ferrari HR, Lázaro L. Sobre el etograma, 1: del etograma como lenguaje al lenguaje de los etogramas. Revista de Etología. 2002 Dec;4(2):129-41.
13. Lorenz K. The companion in the bird’s world. The Auk. 1937. 54:24573.
14. Nacipucha P.K.C. Bienestar del lechón en la fase de lactanción. Tesis doctoral. Facultad de veterinaria. Universidad de Murcia. 2014.