Determination of the Critical Period of Phytosanitary Treatment against Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) Pests in Southern Togo

Author(s): Nyamador Wolali Seth, Tounou Agbéko Kodjo, Bakouma Batossa Emmanuel, Agboka Komi

Economically efficient and environmentally friendly technology is essential for sustainable agricultural production. To optimize cowpea production through an economically profitable and environmentally friendly phytosanitary treatment technology, trials were conducted in a station based on Acarius 18 EC at a rate of 1 liter/ha against the main cowpea insect pests. A complete randomized block device with three replications of four objects each with two sub-trials: an early competition (EC) sub-trial and a late competition (LC) sub-trial were adopted. Seed yield and the critical period for phytosanitary treatment have been determined. The best yields were obtained on objects that received the first treatment 28 days after sowing (DAS) (2.13 t/ha on average) for EC and on objects that received the last treatment 42 DAS (2.23 t/ha on average) for LC. Under the conditions of our study, the critical period of phytosanitary treatment against cowpea pests (VITOCO) for optimum yield is then between 28 and 42 DAS.

Cowpea Pests, Early Competition, Late Competition, Critical Treatment Period

1. Al-Marzra’Awi, M.S. Kevan, P.G. et Shipp, L., 2007 Development of Beauveria bassiana dry formulation for vectoring by honey bees Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) to the flowers of crops for pest control. Biocontrol science and technology, vol. 17, no. 7, p. 733-741.
2. Amador-Ramirez M.D., 2002. Critical period of weed control in transplanted chillipepper. Weed Research 42:203-209.
3. Atachi P. et Sourokou B., 1989. Use of decis and systoate for the control of Maruca testularis (Geyer) in cowpea. Insect sci. Applic. 3373-381.
4. Atachi P. et Adeoti R., 2004. Interaction plante- animal : un cas d'étude d'utilisation de quelques formulations combinées d'insecticides dans la gestion des insectes ravageurs de niébé, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. au Sud-Bénin - Sciences du Végétal, 2 : 7-21.
5. Atachi P., Dannon E. A. et Rurema D. G., 2007. Trap cropping and intercropping of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan Millsp) in pest management of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in southern Bénin: competing risk and pest status in pod attack. Annales des Sciences Agronomiques du Bénin 9 (1), 1-20.
6. Brown A.W. N., 1957. Insecticide resistance and darwinism. Botyu-Kagaku, 22, 277-282
7. Carvalho G. A., Reis P. R., Moraes J. C., Fuini L. C., Rocha L. C. D.; Goussain M. M., 2012. Efeitos de alguns inseticidas utilizados na cultura do tomateiro (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) a Trichogramma pretiosum Riley, 1879 (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae).
8. Cruz Mendez, A. V. ; Corchado Juarbe, N. ; Siberio Torres, V., 1988. Storage and digestibility, voluntary intake and chemical components of hay of five tropical grasses. J. Agric. Univ. P. Rico, 72 (4): 531-543.
9. Djiéto-Lordon C., Aléné D. C. et Reboul J. L., 2007. Contribution à la connaissance des insectes associés aux cultures maraichères dans les environs de Yaoundé- Cameroun Cam J. Biol. Biochem. Sc., 15, 1-13.
10. Dugje I. Y., Omoigui L. O., Ekeleme F., Kamara A. Y. & Ajeigbe H., 2009. Production du niébé en Afrique de l’Ouest : guide du paysan. IITA-Ibadan, 26 p.
11. Djiba Saliou, 1986. La dynamique des populations des ravageurs ; éléments essentiels pour une protection intégrée des cultures vivrières de basse Casamance. Centre de Recherche Agricole CRA- Djibelor, 54p.
12. Evans, S.P., Knezevic S.Z., Lindquist J.L, et Shapiro C.A. 2003. Influence of nitrogen and duration of weed interference on corn growth and development. Weed Science 51:546-556.
13. FAO, 2009. Agricultural production crop primary database. Food Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations, Rome.www.Faostat.Fao./faostat.
14. FAOSTAT 2013. Site internet : http://www.faostat.fao.org
15. Halford C, Hamill A.S., Zhang J., et Doucet C. 2001. Critical period of weed control in no-till soybean (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays). Weed Technology 15:737-744.
16. Lyon Laboratory, August 2013. Plant Protection Products Resistance, 57p.
17. Martin, S.G., Van Acker R.C. et Friesen L.F. 2001. Critical period of weed control in spring canola. Weed Science 49:326-333.
18. Morin Y. et Chouinard G. 2014. Les pucerons. Dans G. Chouinard (coord): Guide de référence en production fruitière intégrée à l’intention des producteurs de pommes du Québec. Institut de recherche et de développement en agroenvironnement, Québec, QC, 56p.
19. Norsworthy J. K. et Oliveira M. 2004. Comparison of the critical period for weed control in wide- and narrow-row corn. Weed Science 52: 802-807.
20. NRI., 1991. Aperçu général de la lutte biologique intégrée dans les pays en développement, Natural Ressources Institut, Chattham, 20p.
21. Pasquet R. S., Baudoin J. P. 1997. Le niébé, Vigna unguiculata. In Charrier A., Jacquot M., Hammon S., Nicolas D. (eds). l’amélioration des plantes tropicales. Montpellier, France: cirad-orstom, 483–505.
22. Rosales-Roblès E. R., Sanchez-de de la Cruz, et Salinas-Garcia J.R. 2005. Critical period of competition of wild sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in grain sorghum. Agrociencia 39: 205-210.
23. Rusoke D. G. & Rubaihayo P. R. 1994. The influence of some crop protection management practices on yield stability of cowpeas. Afr. Crop Sci. J 2, 143-148.
24. Singh S. R., Jackai L.E.N., Dos Santos J. H. R. et Adalla C. B. 1990. Insect Pest of Cowpea. In: Insect Pests of Tropical Food Legumes. 43-89.
25. Swanton C. J. et Weise S.F. 1991. Integrated weed management: the rational and approach. Weed Technology 5: 657-663.
26. Tounou A. K., Sokame B. M., Akpavi S., Ganyo K., Ketoh K. G., Gumedzoe Y. Mawuena D. 2012. Effets des extraits végétaux sur la dynamique de populations des insectes ravageurs de niébé, Vigna unguiculata Walp, Dans le sud du Togo. J. Rech. Sci. Série A, 14(1): 25-34.
27. Van Acker R. C., Swanton C.J., et Weise S.F. 1993. The critical period of weed control in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Weed Science 41: 194-200.