Use of Ionophores in Goat Feeding

Author(s): M. G. Muro, R. Arias, M. S. Trigo, M. A. Eirin, A. C. Cattáneo, K. Steffen, C. A. Cordiviola

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of monensin addition on the total dry matter intake, in goat diets, composed of 30 % alfalfa hay and 70 % corn. Four fistulated cross breed goats (Nubian x Creole), 39.77 ± 1.07 kg live body weight (BW), were used in experimental design. Two experiments were carried out: I) Determining total dry matter intake (TDMI), pasture dry matter intake (PDMI), total daily and hourly intake (TDHI) and total dry matter digestibility (TDMD); II) Determining ruminal pH. Treatments consisted of an instance without monensin (D0), and another one with monensin (D1). In both cases, intake level was adjusted to 3 % of BW. There were no significant effects (p < 0.05) on TDMI, PDMI, TDHI, TDMD and BW. The registered TDHI during the 12 h after feed had an effect on time. The area below the curve, with a 5.8 and 6 pH threshold, proved a significant linear drop-off (p < 0.05) for D1. As regards the hours with pH value below pH threshold, there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between treatments, only a tendency (p = 0,074) to keep pH values below 5.8 for a greater number hours in D0. The average pH of the day showed a tendency to be higher (p = 0,056) for D1. The lowest ruminal pH was observed between the 8 and 12 h after food intake, and with significant differences (p > 0.05) between hours, but the treatment had no effects on the evolution of pH in time. Therefore, we can conclude that the addition of monensin in highly energetic diets for goats had a moderating effect in the ruminal pH, and in the number of daily food concentrate meals. However, there was no register of acute acidosis with these diets.

Monensin, Goats, Intake

1. Araújo J.S., J.R.O. Pérez, P.C.A. Paiva, E.C.T.M. Peixoto, G.C. Braga, V. Oliveira & L.C.D. Valle. 2006. Efeito da monensina sódica no consumo de alimentos e pH ruminalem ovinos. ArchVetSci11:39-43.
2. Arias, R., M. G. Muro, C.A. Cordiviola, M.S. Trigo, M. Brusa& R. A. Lacchini. 2013. Incidencia de la proporción de maíz sobre la degradabilidad in situ de heno de alfalfa en dietas para caprinos. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía, La Plata. 112 (2) 62-67.
3. Baran M & R. Žitñan. 2002. Effect of monensin sodium on fermentation efficiency in sheep rumen. Arch TierzDummerstort45:181-185.
4. Bergen, W.G & D.B. Bates. 1984. Ionophores: their effect on production, efficiency and mode of action. J. Anim. Sci. 58: 1465-1883.
5. Church, D.C. 1988. The ruminant animal. Digestive physiology and nutrition. Prentice Hall, Englewoods Cliffs, NJ. 641pp.
6. Dennis, S.M., T.G Nagaraja& E.E Bartley. 1981 Effects of lasalocid or monensin on lactate-producing or-using rumen bacteria. J. Anim. Sci. 52: 418-426.
7. Dinius, D. A., M. S. Simpson and P. B. Marsh. 1976. Effect of monensin fed with forage on digestion and the ruminal ecosystem of steers. J. Anim. Sci. 42:229-234.
8. Duff, G. C., M. L. Galyean, M. E. Branine, D. M. Hallford, M. E. Hubbert, E. Fredrickson & A. J. Pordomingo. 1990. Effects of continuous versus daily rotational feeding of monensin plus tylosin and lasalocid on serum insulin and growth hormone concentrations in beef steers fed a 90% concentrate diet. Proc. Natl. Amer. Soc. Anim. Sci. 41:55-58.
9. Erickson, G. E., C. T. Milton, K. C. Fanning, R. J. Cooper, R. S. Swingle., J. C. Parrott, G. Vogel & T. J. Klopfenstein. 2003. Interaction between bunk management and monensin concentration on finishing performance, feeding behavior, and ruminal metabolism during an acidosis challenge with feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 81:2869-2879.
10. Forbes, J. M. 2003. The multifactorial nature of food intake control. J. Anim. Sci. 81(E. Suppl. 2):E139–E144.
11. Gonçalves, A., R. Paula Lana, M. Teixeira Rodríguez, R. Mendonça Vieira, A. Queiroz& D.Sampaio Henrique.2001. PadrãoNictemeral do pH Ruminal e Comportamento Alimentar de Cabras Leiteiras Alimentadas com Dietas Contendo Diferentes RelaçõesVolumoso: Concentrado. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 30(6):1886-1892.
12. Harwood, D. 2004. Diseases of dairy goats. In Practice 26, pp. 248-259.
13. Littell, R. C., P. R. Henry & C. B. Ammerman. 1998. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. J. Anim. Sci. 76:1216-1231.
14. Mazza, P.H., W.R. Soares, L. Melotti& R. Manzini. 2001. Monensina e digestibilidad aparente em ovinos alimentados comproporções de volumoso/concentrado. ScientiaAgrícola58, 449-455.
15. Milleo, T.C., W. Hartman, J.A.G. Hill, U.G. Netto& F.R Maurer Jr. 2006. Alteracoesclinicas e laboratoriaisem bovinos emquadro de acidose latica ruminal. Em: Anais.Seminario de IniciacaoCientifica da UniversidadeTuiuti do Parana, Curitiba. Pp 5.
16. Moore, J.A., M.H.Poore, J.M.Luginbuhl. 2002. By-product feeds for meat goats: Effects on digestibility, ruminal environment, and carcass characteristics. J. Anim. Science.80:1752–1758.
17. Mouro G.F., A.F Branco, D.L. Harmon, F.J. Maia, S.M. Coneglian& T.F. Minela. 2006. Fontes de carboidratos e ionóforoem dietas contendo óleo vegetal para ovinos: digestibilidade, balanço de nitrogênio e fluxo portal de nutrientes. R Bras Zootec35: 2144-2153.
18. Pitt, R. E. & A. N. Pell. 1997. Modeling ruminal pH fluctuations: Interactions between meal frequency and digestion rate. J. DairySci. 80:2429–2441.
19. Plata F.X., R.R. Velasco, L.M. Melgoza, B.A. Lara, E. Aranda & D. Mendoza. 2004. Un cultivo de levadura (Saccharomycescerevisiae) y la monensina sódica en el comportamiento productivo de ovinos, RC 14: 522-525.
20. Pordomingo, A.J. 1990.Effects of daily and weekly rotations of lasalocid and monensin plus tylosin compared with continuous feeding of ionophores on ruminal fermentation in beef steers fed a 90% concentrate diet. PhD Dissertation, New Mexico State Univ. USA. pp.1-12.
21. Pordomingo, A.J., Galyean, M. E., Branine, M. E. & Freeman, A.S. 1999.Effects of daily and weekly rotations of lasalocid and monensin plus tylosin compared with continuous feeding of each ionophore on daily dry matter intake and digest kinetics. Rev. Arg. Prod. Anim. 19:383 – 390.
22. Ramos, J. 2005. Obtención de un concentrado energético proteínico por fermentación en estado sólido de la caña de azúcar para bovinos en ceba. Dr. Tesis. Instituto de Ciencia Animal. La Habana, Cuba.
23. RasoolSadjadian, Hesam A. Seifi, MehrdadMohri, Abbas AliNaserian and NimaFarzaneh. 2013. Effects of Monensin on Metabolism and Production in Dairy Saanen Goats in Periparturient Period. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 26:82-89
24. Santini, F.J. & O.N. Di Marco. 1983. Monensina. Modo de acción y su efecto sobre el comportamiento productivo del animal. Rev. Arg. Prod. Anim. 3:345-
25. SAS institute inc.2004 SAS On line Doc#9.1.3.cary, NC: SAS institute.inc.
26. Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. S., K. A. Beauchemin, D. J. Gibb, D. H. Crews, Jr., D. D. Hickman, M. Streeter & T. A. McAllister. 2003. Effect of bunk management on feeding behavior, ruminal acidosis and performance of feedlot cattle: A review. J. Anim. Sci. 81:E149-E158.