Household Dependency on Buffer Zone Community Forest and its Implication for Management of Chitwan National Park, Nepal

Author(s): Debendra Bhandari, Zhou Jianhua

Conservation of biodiversity in Protected Areas will be more challenging if local communities are heavily dependent on them for various forest products and subsistence needs. Thus this study sought to identify the demographic and socioeconomic variable that influence forest dependency exploring the relationship of forest dependency and household characteristics of the households of the Panbari Buffer Zone Community Forest User Group of Chitwan National Park, Nepal. A sample of 130 households was randomly selected for the household survey using stratified random sampling and collected was analyzed using logistic regression model. Logistic regression result indicate that wealth status of the poor household, household family size, livestock population, agricultural income and education are the five major determinants of forest dependency in Panbari Buffer Zone Community Forest. Policy interventions to ensure long-term success of landscape-level conservation of Chitwan National Park are needed to decrease dependence on forest resources expanding educational and training opportunities; and the policy measures that aim at increasing agriculture income, generating off-farm employment opportunities, supply of the alternatives of fuel wood energy and adopting agrisilvicultural system for the supply of fodder for the livestock.

Buffer Zone Community Forest, Chitwan National Park, forest dependency, logistic regression, Nepal

1. Adam, Y.O., and EL Tayeb, M.A. 2014. Forest Dependency and its Effect on Conservation in Sudan: A Case of Sarf-Saaid Reserved Forest in Gadarif State. Agriculture & Forestry 60(3): 107–121.
2. Adhikari, B. 2003a. What Determines Household Dependency on Community Forests; Paper Submitted to the World Forestry Congress, Qubic,Canada. Available from http://www.fao.org/docrep/ARTICLE/WFC/XII/0044-A1.HTM#P10_167 [accessed 22 October 2016].
3. Adhikari, B. 2003b. Property Rights and Natural Resources: Socio-Economic Heterogeneity and Common Property Resource Management. South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics (SANDEE). Kathmandu, Nepal.
4. Adhikari, B., Di Falco, S., and Lovett, J.C. 2004. Household Characteristics and Forest Dependency: Evidence from Common Property Forest Management in Nepal. Ecological Economics 48(2): 245–257. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.08.008.
5. Adhikari, B., and Lovett, J.C. 2006. Transaction Costs and Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Nepal. Journal of Environmental Management 78(1): 5–15. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.005.
6. Baland, J.-M., and Platteau, J.-P. 1999. The Ambiguous Impact of Inequality on Local Resource Management. World Development 27(5): 773–788. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00026-1.
7. Baral, N., and Heinen, J.T. 2007. Resources Use, Conservation Attitudes, Management Intervention and Park-People Relations in the Western Terai landscape of Nepal. Environmental Conservation 34(1): 64. doi:10.1017/S0376892907003670.
8. Beckley, T.M. 1998. The Nestedness of Forest Dependence: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Exploration. Society and Natural resource 11(2): 101–121.
9. Bhandari, A.R., and Uibrig, H. 2008. Who is Benefiting More from Common Property Forest Resources: Poor or LessPoor? Banko Janakari 18(1): 42–47.
10. Bhusal, N.P. 2014. Buffer Zone Management System in Protected Areas of Nepal. The Third Pole: Journal of Geography Education 11: 34–44. doi:10.3126/ttp.v11i0.11558.
11. Budhathoki, P. 2005. Royal Chitwan National Park: A World Heritage Site with Buffer Zone. In People and Protected Areas in South Asia. Edited by U.R. Sharma and P.B. Yonzon. Resources Himalaya Foundation.
12. Bwalya, S.M. 2011. Household Dependence on Forest Income in Rural Zambia. Zambia Social Journal 2(1): 67–86.
13. Cavendish, W. 2000. Empirical Regularities in the Poverty-Environment Relationship of Rural Households: Evidence from Zimbabwe. World Development 28(11): 1979–2003. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00066-8.
14. CBS. 2011. Nepal living Standards Survey 2010/11. Government of Nepal, National Planning Commission Secretariat, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS). Kathmandu, Nepal.
15. Chandool, C. 2007. Households’ Resource Use, Conservation Attitude and Percieved Socioeconomic Impact of the Protected Areas Policy in the Nariva Swamp, Trinidad and Tabago. PhD Thesis. University of Florida.
16. CNP. 2013. Chitwan National Park and it’s Buffer Zone: Management Plan 2013-2017. Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Chitwan National Park (CNP). Chitwan, Nepal.
17. CNP. 2015. Chitwan National Park:Annual report (2014 July to 2015 June). Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Chitwan National Park (CNP). Chitwan, Nepal.
18. Coulibaly-Lingani, P., Tigabu, M., Savadogo, P., Oden, P.C., and Ouadba, J.M. 2009. Determinants of Access to Forest Products in Southern Burkina Faso. Forest Policy and Economics 11(7): 516–524. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2009.06.002.
19. Dhakal, B., and Thapa, B. 2015. Buffer Zone Management Issues in Chitwan National Park , Nepal : a Case Study of Kolhuwa Village Development. Parks 21(2).
20. Dhakal, M., and Masuda, M. 2008. Role of Participatory Forest Management in Rural Livelihood Improvement : A Case of Nawalparasi District , Nepal. Tropics 17(2): 159–168. doi:10.3759/tropics.17.159.
21. Dhital, K. 2004. Environmental Economic Methods of Evaluating Protected Area (A case study of Chitwan National Park). Printers world. Kathmandu,Nepal.
22. DNPWC. 2016. Annual Report, Fiscal Year July 2015-June 2016. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC). Kathmandu, Nepal.
23. DoF. 2016. Community Forestry. Department of Forests, Community Forest Division. Kathmandu, Nepal. Available from http://dof.gov.np/dof_community_forest_division/community_forestry_dof [accessed 24 November 2016].
24. Elands, B.H.M., O’Leary, T.N., Boerwinkel, H.W.J., and Freerk Wiersum, K. 2004. Forests as a Mirror of Rural Conditions; Local Views on the Role of Forests Across Europe. Forest Policy and Economics 6(5): 469–482. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2004.01.003.
25. FAO. 2003. Compendium of Agricultural–Environmental Indicators: 1989–91 to 2000. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United States (FAO). Rome.
26. FAO. 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010. Food and Agriculture organisation of the United States (FAO) 147: 350 pp. Rome.
27. Fikir, D., Tadesse, W., and Gure, A. 2016. Economic Contribution to Local Livelihoods and Households Dependency on Dry Land Forest Products in Hammer District, Southeastern Ethiopia. International Journal of Forestry Research 2016: 1–11. doi:10.1155/2016/5474680.
28. Fonta, W.M., Ichoku, H.E., and Ayuk, E. 2011. The Distributional Impacts of Forest Income on Household Welfare in Rural Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 2(1): 1–13. Available from http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEDS/article/view/130.
29. Gautam, A.P., Shivakoti, G.P., and Webb, E.L. 2004. A Review of Forest Policies, Institutions, and Changes in the Resource Condition in Nepal. International Forestry Review 6(2): 136–148. doi:10.1505/ifor.6.2.136.38397.
30. Gautam, K.H. 2006. Forestry, Politicians and Power—Perspectives from Nepal’s Forest Policy. Forest Policy and Economics 8(2): 175–182. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2004.07.001.
31. GoN. 2014. Review of Implementation of the Master Plan for the Forestry Sector: Achievements and Lessons. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation. Kathmandu, Nepal.
32. Gunatilake, H. 1998. The Role of Rural Development in Protecting Tropical Rainforests: Evidence from Sri Lanka. Journal of Environmental Management 53(3): 273–292. doi:10.1006/jema.1998.0201.
33. Gurung, A., Karki, R., and Bista, R. 2011. Community-Based Forest Management in Nepal : Opportunities and Challenges. Resources and Environment 1(1): 26–31. doi:10. 5923/j.re.20110101.04.
34. Hegde, R., and Enters, T. 2000. Forest Products and Household Economy: A Case Study from Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary, Southern India. Environmental Conservation 27(3): 250–259. doi:10.1017/S037689290000028X.
35. HMGN. 1992. Labour Act 1992. His Majestys’ Government of Nepal.
36. HMGN. 1996. Buffer Zone Management Regulation 1996. His Majestys’ Government of Nepal, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation. Kathmandu, Nepal.
37. Illukpitiya, P.M.P. 2006. Agricultural Effeciency and Dependency on Forest Resources: An Economic Analysis of Rural Households and the Conservation of Natural Forests in Srilanka. PhD Thesis. University of Hawai.
38. ILO. 2007. Working Time Around the World:Trends in Working Hours, Laws and Policies in a Global Comparative Perspective. International Labour Organization: 239. Geneva. doi:10.4324/9780203945216.
39. Jain, P., and Sajjad, H. 2015. Household Dependency on Forest Resources in the Sariska Tiger Reserve (STR), India: Implications for Management. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 35(1): 60–74. doi:10.1080/10549811.2015.1099108.
40. Khanal, K.P. 2001. Economic Evaluation of Community Forestry in Nepal and its Equity Distribution Effect. M.Sc. Thesis. Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University. Copenhagen, Denmark.
41. Köhlin, G., and Parks, P.J. 2001. Spatial Variability and Disincentives to Harvest: Deforestation and Fuelwood Collection in South Asia. Land Economics 77(2): 206–218. doi:10.3368/le.77.2.206.
42. Lepetu, J. 2007. Socio Economic Impact and Stakeholder Preference to Conservation of Forest Reserves: A Case Study of Kasane Forest Reserve, Botswana. PhD Thesis. University of Florida.
43. Lepetu, J., Alavalapati, J., and Nair, P.K. 2009. Forest Dependency and its Implication for Protected Areas Management: A Case Study from Kasane Forest Reserve, Botswana. International Journal of Environmental Research 3(4): 525–536.
44. Mamo, G., Sjaastad, E., and Vedeld, P. 2007. Economic Dependence on Forest Resources: A Case from Dendi District, Ethiopia. Forest Policy and Economics 9(8): 916–927. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2006.08.001.
45. Masozera, M.K. 2002. Socioeconomic Impact Analysis of the Conservation of the Nyungwe Forest Reserve, Rwanda. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Florida.
46. Masozera, M.K., and Alavalapati, J.R.R. 2004. Forest Dependency and its Implications for Protected Areas Management: A Case Study From the Nyungwe Forest Reserve, Rwanda. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 19(sup004): 85–92. doi:10.1080/14004080410034164.
47. Mehta, J.N., and Heinan, J.T. 2001. Does Community-Based Conservation Shape Favorable Attitudes Among Locals? An Empirical Study from Nepal. Environmental Management 28(2): 165–177. doi:10.1007/s002670010215.
48. Mertler, C.A., and Vannatta, R.A. 2005. Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods: Practical Application and Interpretation. In 3rd edition. Pyrczak, California, USA.
49. Moe, K.T., and Liu, J. 2016. Economic Contribution of Non-timber Forest Products (NTFPs) to Rural Livelihoods in the Tharawady District of Myanmar. doi:10.18483/ijSci.904.
50. Neuman, L.W. 1994. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. In Allyn and Bacon, 2nd edition. London.
51. New ERA/UNDP. 2004. Impact Assessment of Buffer zone Programme in Nepal. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Kathmandu, Nepal.
52. Odihi, J. 2003. Deforestation in Afforestation Priority zone in Sudano-Sahelian Nigeria. Applied Geography 23(4): 227–259. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2003.08.004.
53. Pandey, R., Harrison, S., and Gupta, A.K. 2014. Resource Availability versus Resource Extraction in Forests: Analysis of Forest Fodder System in Forest Density Classes in Lower Himalayas, India. Small-scale Forestry 13(3): 267–279. doi:10.1007/s11842-013-9253-3.
54. Pandit, R., and Bevilacqua, E. 2011. Forest Users and Environmental Impacts of Community Forestry in the Hills of Nepal. Forest Policy and Economics 13(5): 345–352. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2011.03.009.
55. Panta, M., Kim, K., and Joshi, C. 2008. Temporal Mapping of Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Nepal: Applications to Forest Conservation. Forest Ecology and Management 256(9): 1587–1595. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.07.023.
56. Parker, P., and Thapa, B. 2012. Natural Resource Dependency and Decentralized Conservation Within Kanchenjunga Conservation Area Project, Nepal. Environmental Management 49(2): 435–444. doi:10.1007/s00267-011-9791-4.
57. PBZCF. 2015. Panbari Bufferzone Community Forest Operation Plan (2015/2016 - 2019/2020). Panbari Bufferzone Community Forest User Group. Naya Belhani 1 and 2, Nawalparasi.
58. Peng, C.-Y.J., and So, T.-S.H. 2002. Logistic Rrgression Analysis and Reporting: A Primer. Understanding Statistics 1(1): 31–70.
59. Pokharel, R.K., Tiwari, K.R., and Rayamajhi, S. 2012. Nepal’s Community Forestry: Need of Better Governance. In Global Perspectives on Sustainable Forest Management. Edited by C.A. Okia. InTech. pp. 43–58. doi:10.5772/33439.
60. Rai, R.K., Neupane, P., and Dhakal, A. 2016. Is the Contribution of Community Forest Users Financially Efficient? A Household Level Benefit-Cost Analysis of Community Forest Management in Nepal. International Journal of the Commons 10(1): 142–157. doi:10.18352/ijc.594.
61. Rai, R.K., and Scarborough, H. 2013. Economic Value of Mitigation of Plant Invaders in a Subsistence Economy: Incorporating Labour as a Mode of Payment. Environment and Development Economics 18(02): 225–244. doi:10.1017/S1355770X1200037X.
62. Rai, R.K., and Scarborough, H. 2015. Nonmarket Valuation in Developing Countries: Incorporating Labour Contributions in Environmental Benefits Estimates. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 59(4): 479–498. doi:10.1111/1467-8489.12071.
63. Reddy, S.R.C., and Chakravarty, S.P. 1999. Forest Dependence and Income Distribution in a Subsistence Economy: Evidence from India. World Development 27(7): 1141–1149. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00057-1.
64. Richards, M., Kanel, K., Maharjan, M.R., and Davies, J. 1999. Towards Participatory Economic Analysis by Forest User Groups in Nepal. Overseas Development Institute in collaboration with the Nepal-UK Community Forestry Project.
65. Richards, M., Maharjan, M., and Kanel, K. 2003. Economics, Poverty and Transparency: Measuring Equity in Forest User Groups. Journal of Forest and Livelihood 3(1): 91–106.
66. Sapkota, I.P., and Odén, P.C. 2008. Household Characterstics and Dependency on Community Forests. International Journal of Social Forestry 1(2): 123–144.
67. Shrestha, U.B., Shrestha, B.B., and Shrestha, S. 2010. Biodiversity Conservation in Community Forests of Nepal: Rhetoric and Reality. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation 2(5): 98–104. Available from http://www.academicjournals.org/article/article1380179127_Shrestha et al.pdf.
68. Spiteri, A., and Nepal, S.K. 2008. Distributing Conservation Incentives in the Buffer zone of Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Environmental Conservation 35(1): 76–86. doi:10.1017/S0376892908004451.
69. Sunderlin, W.D., Belcher, B., Santoso, L., Angelsen, A., Burgers, P., Nasi, R., and Wunder, S. 2005. Livelihoods, Forests, and Conservation in Developing Countries: An Overview. World Development 33(9 SPEC. ISS.): 1383–1402. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.004.
70. Tieguhong, J.C., and Nkamgnia, E.M. 2012. Household Dependence on Forests around Lobeke National Park, Cameroon. International Forestry Review 14(2): 196–212. doi:10.1505/146554812800923426.
71. Varughese, G., and Ostrom, E. 2001. The Contested Role of Heterogeneity in Collective Action: Some Evidence from Community Forestry in Nepal. World Development 29(5): 747–765. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00012-2.
72. Wunder, S. 2001. Poverty Alleviation and Tropical Forests - What Scope for Synergies? World Development 29(11): 1817–1833. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00070-5.